FEATURED ARTICLE: Did a Hacked Hillary Email Set Up the Ambush of Ambassador Christopher Stevens?

Posted on August 25th, 2015

Hillary’s Loose Emails from www.caglecartoons.com # 161399EDITOR’S COMMENT: After assimilating all the public information that is now available, this scenario is very plausible. And, it reminds me of the World War II slogan that reminded everyone that “Loose Lips Might Sink Ships”. In Hillary’s case it would be more appropriate to refer to this as “Loose Emails”. Loose lips sink ships is an American English idiom meaning “beware of unguarded talk”. Note the word “unguarded”!

By Thomas Lifson

Putting together the information now publicly available, the question has to be asked: Did an ISIS hack of Hillary Clinton’s virtually defenseless home brew server set up the death of Ambassador Christopher Stevens?

ISIS has proven itself adept enough at information technology that a successful hack of Hillary Clinton’s server at her Chappaqua mansion cannot be ruled out, no matter how many Secret Service members stood guard. Apparently unbeknownst to the former secretary of state who boasted of the server’s security because of the guards outside, it is so easy to hack a garden variety server set up by a mom-and-pop operation that an ISIS (and Russian intelligence and Chinese and Romanian and many other agencies) hack is well within the realm of possibility.

Now consider what the New York Post reported yesterday, six paragraphs into a story. Paul Sperry writes:

US intelligence officials so far have determined that at least four — and as many as 305 — of the more than 30,000 e-mails Clinton and her aides have printed out and turned over to investigators were classified at the time they were written.

They include a 2011 message from Clinton’s top aides that contains military intelligence from United States Africa Command gleaned from satellite images of troop movements in Libya, along with the travel and protection plans for Ambassador Christopher Stevens, who was later killed in a terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya. Another staff ­e-mail sent to Clinton in 2012 contained investigative data about Benghazi terrorist suspects wanted by the FBI. Read More..


Posted on August 18th, 2015

Waiting for ISIS War Authorization Vote from www.caglecartoons.com # 165779EDITOR’S COMMENT: The following comments have been on the internet for the past year or so, so you may have already seen them. If not, these comments are very timely in this age of Obama/Hillary and Trump! And, I thank a good friend for reminding me of them!

NOTE: You will need to go to READ MORE to learn the Texan’s thoughts on Rattlesnakes!

Keep it simple!

As long as we insist on maintaining the “moral high ground” we will NEVER win the war on terrorism!   We’re in a conflict in which we absolutely INSIST in playing by the rules against a maniacal group who have NO rules! Read More..

You Can’t Keep Up with Obama’s Incompetence, Corruption, and Hyperactivity

Posted on July 20th, 2015

A Serious EnemyBy Deroy Murdock

I awoke to the news that Obama has fallen way behind on his promise to train moderate Syrians to fight ISIS. After budgeting some $500 million to instruct and equip 3,000 anti-ISIS troops by year’s end, Obama, in fact, has unleashed 60 such combatants. That’s 2 percent down, 98 percent to go. But, hey, what’s the rush?

Even before the advent of ISIS, Obama originally touted this effort as a bulwark against the brutality of Bashar Assad, the dictator of Damascus. “We are particularly interested in making sure that we are mobilizing the moderate forces inside of Syria,” Obama declared at a presidential debate on October 22, 2012. Thirty-two months later, Obama’s moderate Syrian force boasts a whopping five dozen members.

“Ideologies are not defeated with guns,” Obama explained Monday. “They are defeated by better ideas and more attractive and more compelling vision.” If only we had deployed copies of The Federalist Papers on Omaha Beach, rather than GIs. We could have crushed Hitler in a jiffy.

Senator John McCain (R., Ariz.) told Fox News Channel’s Martha MacCallum Wednesday, “In all the years that I have observed different conflicts and American conduct of foreign policy and national-security policy, this is the most bizarre.” Read More..

Israel Will Attack Iran Soon

Posted on July 16th, 2015

Iran Nuke SitesEDITOR’S COMMENT: I truly believe that Israel has finally decided that it has no choice, but to try and stop, or at least slow, the Iranian nuclear program. The recently-concluded Obama deal was much worse that they expected, particularly with regard to the lifting of the international arms embargo, and the lifting of the ban on missile technology. I believe that Israel will certainly not attack, while Congress is debating the ‘merits’ of this Obama deal, but would expect them to strike sometime right before or right after the recently purchased Russian surface-to-air missiles are delivered and installed.

By Alan Caruba

The Israelis will destroy several Iranian nuclear facilities and my educated guess is that they will do so before the end of this year.

Israel has no margin of error when it comes to nuclear reactors in nations that threaten its existence. While President Obama does everything in his power to enable Iran to create its own nuclear weapons, it is a good idea to recall that in June 1981 the Israelis destroyed a reactor in Iraq. It was the first air strike against such a facility. In September 2007, the Israelis destroyed a Syrian reactor. There was no reprisal in either case. Read More..

REPORT: Ret. Vice Chief Of Staff: Obama Administration Does Anything Iranians Tell Them To Do

Posted on July 13th, 2015

Obama easy on IranBy Yochanan Visser

“The Iranians have told the administration not to arm the Kurds.”

Retired Army three-star general and former Army Asst. Vice Chief of Staff Jay Garner told Howard Altman of The Tampa Tribune that the U.S. Administration is taking orders from Tehran not to arm the Kurdish militia in northern Iraq and Syria.

“The Iranians have told the administration not to arm the Kurds. They back the government in Baghdad, which is a puppet government to Iran. Our administration is so immersed in this nuclear deal (with Iran) that I think they will do anything the Iranians tell them to do,” Garner said.

Garner is convinced that the Kurds can defeat Islamic State if they receive the necessary weapons. He claims that if the U.S. would give the Kurds A-10 Thunderbolt IIs and Apache attack helicopters, Javelin and TOW anti-tank weapons, 81 mm mortars, and M113 armored personnel carriers and armored Humvees, they would be able to continue their advances toward Raqqa in Syria and Mosul in Iraq.

“They have over 600 miles of frontage,” Garner said. “They have to guard the whole front and all that they have is light infantry.” Read More..

US Blocks Attempts by Arab Allies to Fly Heavy Weapons Directly to Kurds to Fight Islamic State

Posted on July 2nd, 2015

Anti ISIS strategy from www.caglecartoons.com # 165318EDITOR’S COMMENT: WHY, WHY are we doing this? Unfortunately, what you have here is a bunch of progressive, anti-war, unqualified and inexperienced Washington bureaucrats dictating to our military our military planning (not strategy, because there is none). Now, it appears that these same political hacks are also dictating to our allies, what their overall strategy should be! This is no way to win a battle, never mind a war.

By Con Coughlin

Middle East allies accuse Barack Obama and David Cameron of failing to show strategic leadership in fight against Islamic State.

The United States has blocked attempts by its Middle East allies to fly heavy weapons directly to the Kurds fighting Islamic State jihadists in Iraq, The Telegraph has learnt.

Some of America’s closest allies say President Barack Obama and other Western leaders, including David Cameron, are failing to show strategic leadership over the world’s gravest security crisis for decades.

They now say they are willing to “go it alone” in supplying heavy weapons to the Kurds, even if means defying the Iraqi authorities and their American backers, who demand all weapons be channelled through Baghdad. Read More..

No Strategy. No Clue.

Posted on June 15th, 2015

Obama - No Idea What Im DoingBy Alan Caruba

The Wednesday, June 10 Wall Street Journal headline at the top of the page was “Obama Set to Expand Troops in Iraq.” We were 589 days into the two terms Barack Hussein Obama has served in the office of President of the United States and he is as clueless now as he was when he arrived on January 20, 2009.

“President Barack Obama is poised to send hundreds more American advisers to a new base in a strategic Iraqi region to help devise a counterattack against marauding Islamic State militants, U.S. officials said Tuesday, a shift that underscores American concern over recent battlefield losses.” It’s 450 “trainers.”

We have had losses because (1) Obama was elected on a promise to end the conflict in Iraq and (2) reelected by pulling out troops to the point that the remaining Iraqi troops—Shiites in the south—decided it wasn’t worth dying for their leaders. Can’t say I blame them, but dying at the hands of ninth century Islamic fanatics is the fate that threatens the entire Middle East, not just Iraq or what’s left of it.

This is how we lost the war in Vietnam. There was a time when Americans utterly destroyed their enemies on the battlefield. In the latter half of the last century, starting in Korea, we forgot how to do that and why that’s how wars are won. Read More..

Behind Barack Obama’s Delusions of Global Respect

Posted on June 12th, 2015

Obama Looking in a MirrorBy New York Post

At a town-hall meeting last week, President Obama proudly bragged that “today, once again, the United States is the most respected country on earth.”

That jaw-dropper makes sense to him — because the only opinion that counts for the president is the opinion of folks who share his ideology: above all, the belief that America should never use its power unless “world opinion” (i.e., pretty much those same folks) agrees.

So it doesn’t matter that Vladimir Putin laughs at Obama’s America — continuing his invasion of Ukraine with just enough “deniability” that Obama can pretend it’s something else.

Or that China knows it can continue its grab of key sea areas, even building vast artificial islands on which to plant its flag (and weapons), because Obama will never risk confrontation. Read More..

John Bolton Underestimates Obama. We Are Not in Denial, We Are in Surrender

Posted on June 2nd, 2015

Obama Bombs over ISISBy Carol Brown

On Fox News Sunday, John Bolton said we’re losing the war against ISIS because the Obama administration is “blinded by their own ideology.” He went on to say:

I think they’re in denial. I don’t think that’s anything new. I think they’ve been in denial about the war on terror the last six plus years. They don’t want to admit we are in a war. They would rather treat it as a law enforcement matter. That is palpably wrong. I think their unwillingness to understand the nature of the ideological threats we face from the likes of ISIS paralyzes their ability to win. And we are losing. There is no doubt about it.

I have enormous respect for John Bolton, but on this I believe he is wrong.

Bolton is underestimating the very real possibility that is even more horrifying than a president in denial, which is this: Obama’s actions and inactions are all by design. And while Obama is indeed driven by his ideology, the ideology is one that is simpatico with Islam. As a result, of course, we are losing to ISIS, to Islamic terror, to jihad, to the growing Caliphate, to a Middle East spiraling out of control, and to Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon.

What we see unfolding is not because Obama is unwilling to understand the reality on the ground or because he’s paralyzed as to what to do. Quite the opposite. I would suggest that Obama understands the situation quite well. And he’s all on board. There’s no paralysis, much as we might like to think so, giving ourselves a shred of hope that the country didn’t really elect a person to be President of the United States who aligns himself with evil forces that are plotting and acting against us. Read More..

Why Does the Left Kowtow to Islam?

Posted on May 29th, 2015

No Islam fearBy Robert Tracinski

You might suspect that the question answers itself. They kowtow to Islam precisely because it is a real threat, a macroaggression that trumps all of the microaggressions. So you could say that it is simple cowardice. They protest against people they know are extremely unlikely to harm them, and they shut up about the fanatics who might actually follow through on their threats.

But I don’t think that’s the fundamental cause. After all, most lefties are not being called upon to take any personal risk, because somebody else has already stuck his neck out. Drawing or publishing a cartoon of Mohammed might get you put on an al-Qaeda hit list. Simply saying that you support the cartoonist’s defiance of that threat won’t get you on anybody’s list.

In fact, a running theme of the left’s arguments, repeated with a great deal of apparent sincerity, is the notion that it is irrational to fear Islam, that describing the religion as violent and dangerous is “Islamophobia.” They seem to have largely talked themselves into believing that they have nothing personally to fear from Islam. Jihadists may throw gays off of buildings in Syria, but it can’t happen here. Read More..

Do you have an interesting news story that just doesn't "add up," or is not receiving the appropriate coverage in the news, just let us know. We'd love to hear it! And, we'll investigate. CLICK HERE.
Get What Am I Missing Here delivered to your inbox for FREE!