<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>What Am I Missing Here? &#187; 2012 &#187; June</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/date/2012/06/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com</link>
	<description>Jack Kneafsey’s Political and Economic Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:25:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>15 Reasons Why The Obamacare Decision Is A Mind Blowing Disaster For America</title>
		<link>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45681</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45681#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WhatAmIMissingHere</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov't Econ Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation and Deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POLITICAL CARTOONS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. and World Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/?p=45681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45681"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="200" src="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/98589-Obamacare-Costs-by-Nate-Beeler-The-Columbus-Dispatch-515x349.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="Obamacare Costs by Nate Beeler, The Columbus Dispatch" title="Obamacare Costs by Nate Beeler, The Columbus Dispatch" /></a><a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45681/98589-obamacare-costs-by-nate-beeler-the-columbus-dispatch" rel="attachment wp-att-45680"></a>

By End of the American Dream

You can almost always count on the Supreme Court to do the wrong thing.  In fact, just about every major decision by the U.S. Supreme Court over the last 40 years has been bad for America.  Many were hoping that the Supreme Court would strike down Obamacare, but the truth is that we all should have known better than to expect them to get something right.  So <a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45681">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45681/98589-obamacare-costs-by-nate-beeler-the-columbus-dispatch" rel="attachment wp-att-45680"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-45680" title="Obamacare Costs by Nate Beeler, The Columbus Dispatch" src="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/98589-Obamacare-Costs-by-Nate-Beeler-The-Columbus-Dispatch-515x349.jpg" alt="Obamacare Costs by Nate Beeler, The Columbus Dispatch" width="515" height="349" /></a></p>
<p>By End of the American Dream</p>
<p><strong>You can almost always count on the Supreme Court to do the wrong thing.  In fact, just about every major decision by the U.S. Supreme Court over the last 40 years has been bad for America</strong>.  Many were hoping that the Supreme Court would strike down Obamacare, but the truth is that we all should have known better than to expect them to get something right.  <strong>So now America is headed for a complete and total disaster as Obamacare is fully implemented over the next several years.  Obamacare is going to absolutely <span style="text-decoration: underline;">shred the infrastructure of our medical system</span>, it is going to <span style="text-decoration: underline;">send health insurance premiums soaring,</span> it is going to <span style="text-decoration: underline;">dramatically expand the size and the scope of government</span>, it is going to fundamentally <span style="text-decoration: underline;">alter the relationships between doctors and their patients</span> and it is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">one of the largest tax increases in U.S. history</span></strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">.</span>  Not only that, it is also going to add about a trillion dollars to our national debt over the next decade.  So no, the Obamacare decision is not good news<strong>.  Obamacare was one of the worst pieces of legislation in American history, and now we are stuck with it.</strong></p>
<p>It was a 5-4 decision to uphold Obamacare, and the swing vote was Chief Justice John Roberts who was appointed by George W. Bush.</p>
<p>After the vote today, it is hard to have any faith in the U.S. Supreme Court.  Many constitutional conservatives kept voting for Republicans in the hope that the direction of the Supreme Court would change, but it hasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Prior to the Obama administration, Republicans controlled the White House for 20 out of 28 years.  If Republicans were going to fundamentally change the nature of the Supreme Court, that was their opportunity.</p>
<p>But it didn&#8217;t happen.</p>
<p><strong>Instead, what we have is a Supreme Court that is dominated by judges that have very little respect for the U.S. Constitution</strong>.  When I was in law school I got to study the Supreme Court pretty closely and I quickly realized that most of the <strong>time they simply do whatever they want to do and they make up whatever reasons they can to justify their decisions.</strong></p>
<p>That sounds really bad, but that is the truth.</p>
<p>And thanks to the Supreme Court, we are stuck with Obamacare &#8211; at least for now.</p>
<p>The following are 15 reasons why the Obamacare decision is a mind blowing disaster for America&#8230;.</p>
<ol>
<li>According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the federal government has the power to force you to buy <a title="private goods and services" href="http://times247.com/articles/cuccinelli-this-is-a-dark-day-for-america#ixzz1z6gSk4SX" target="_blank">private goods and services</a>.  Now that this door has been opened, what else will we be forced to buy in the future?</li>
<li>Obamacare is another step <a title="away from individual liberty" href="http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=1987&amp;Itemid=28" target="_blank">away from individual liberty</a> and another step toward a &#8220;nanny state&#8221; where the government dominates our lives from the cradle to the grave.</li>
<li>The IRS is now going to be given the task of <a title="hunting down" href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77946.html" target="_blank">hunting down</a> and penalizing millions of Americans that do not have any health insurance.  In fact, the Obama administration has given the IRS <a title="500 million extra dollars" href="http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/health-reform-implementation/220475-white-house-has-diverted-500m-to-irs-to-implement-health-law" target="_blank">500 million extra dollars</a> &#8220;outside the normal appropriations process&#8221; to help them enforce the provisions of Obamacare that they are in charge of overseeing.</li>
<li><strong></strong>Obamacare imposes more than 20 new taxes on the American people.  You can find a comprehensive list of Obamacare taxes <a title="right here" href="http://www.atr.org/comprehensive-list-tax-hikes-obamacare-a5758" target="_blank">right here</a>.  <strong>If you love paying higher taxes, then you are going to absolutely love Obamacare once it is fully implemented.</strong></li>
<li>In an attempt to &#8220;control costs&#8221; and &#8220;promote efficiency&#8221;, Obamacare limits the treatment options that doctors and patients can consider.  This is likely to result in a <a title="decrease in life expectancy" href="http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2012/06/why-life-expectancy-will-decline-under.html" target="_blank">decrease in life expectancy</a> in the United States.</li>
<li>Obamacare is going to impose <a title="nightmarish paperwork burdens" href="http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=1987&amp;Itemid=28" target="_blank">nightmarish paperwork burdens</a> on doctors, hospitals and the rest of the healthcare system.  This is going to significantly increase our healthcare costs as a nation.</li>
<li>Obamacare is going to send health insurance premiums <a title="soaring" href="http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/health-insurance-companies-say-that-they-plan-to-raise-premiums-significantly-because-of-the-new-health-care-reform-law">soaring</a>.  This is especially true <a title="for younger Americans" href="http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2012/06/how-obamacare-will-screw-young.html" target="_blank">for younger Americans</a>.</li>
<li>Many small businesses are going to be <a title="absolutely crushed" href="http://www.nrf.com/modules.php?name=News&amp;op=viewlive&amp;sp_id=1391" target="_blank">absolutely crushed</a> by the provisions in Obamacare that require them to provide expensive health insurance coverage for their employees.  This is going to make them even less competitive with companies in other countries where businesses are not required to provide healthcare for their workers.  <strong>This is also going to make it even less attractive for businesses to hire new employees</strong>.</li>
<li>Obamacare is going to make the emerging <a title="doctor shortage" href="http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/the-coming-doctor-shortage" target="_blank">doctor shortage</a> in America a lot worse.  Surveys have found that we could potentially see <a title="hundreds of thousands of doctors" href="http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/no-doctor-for-you-how-the-federal-government-is-chasing-millions-of-good-doctors-out-of-the-medical-profession">hundreds of thousands of doctors</a> leave the medical profession because of Obamacare.</li>
<li> Obamacare has already forced the cancellation <a title="of dozens" href="http://disasterandemergencysurvival.com/archives/60-doctor-owned-hospitals-will-now-be-canceled-due-to-the-new-health-care-law" target="_blank">of dozens</a> of doctor-owned hospitals.</li>
<li> Obamacare is going to result in a much bigger federal government.  In order to fully implement all of the provisions of Obamacare, hordes of new government bureaucrats will be required.</li>
<li>Thanks to Obamacare, you are going to have to wait much longer to see a doctor.  Just look at what happened once Romneycare was implemented <a title="in Massachusetts" href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/doc_holiday_Nyb5JCHkWyejLq7dTjTs2J/1" target="_blank">in Massachusetts</a>&#8230;.                                                                                                                                                                             <em>In fact, we have already seen the start of this process in Massachusetts, where Mitt Romney’s health care reforms were nearly identical to President Obama’s. Romney’s reforms increased the demand for health care but did nothing to expand the supply of physicians. In fact, by cracking down on insurance premiums, Massachusetts pushed insurers to reduce their payments to providers, making it less worthwhile for doctors to expand their practices. As a result, the average wait to get an appointment with a doctor grew from 33 days to over 55 days.</em></li>
<li>Obamacare contains all kinds of insidious little provisions that most people don&#8217;t even know about.  The following is one example <a title="from the Alliance Defense Fund" href="http://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-law-group-obamacare-is-worse-than-you-think-76135/" target="_blank">from the Alliance Defense Fund</a>&#8230;.                                                                                                                                                                         <em>&#8220;Did you know that with ObamaCare you will have to pay for life-saving drugs, but life-ending drugs are free. One hundred percent free. If this plan were really about health care wouldn&#8217;t it be the other way around?&#8221;</em></li>
<li><strong></strong>As if the U.S. government was not facing enough of a crisis with entitlement spending, it is being projected that Obamacare will add <a title="16 million more Americans" href="http://news.investors.com/Article.aspx?id=598993&amp;ibdbot=1&amp;p=2" target="_blank">16 million more Americans</a> to the Medicaid rolls.  <strong>You and I will be paying for all of this.</strong></li>
<li><strong>The Congressional Budget Office estimates that Obamacare will add more than a trillion dollars to government spending over the next decade</strong>.  Considering the fact that the U.S. government is already <a title="drowning in debt" href="http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/the-real-obama-budget-deficit-for-2011-5-trillion-dollars">drowning in debt</a>, how in the world can we afford this?     (my emphasis)</li>
</ol>
<p>So what do you think about the Obamacare decision?</p>
<p>By End of the American Dream</p>
<p>By permission End of the American Dream</p>
<p><a href="http://endoftheamericandream.com">http://endoftheamericandream.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45681/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Informative Links for June 29, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45575</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45575#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WhatAmIMissingHere</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[INFORMATIVE LINKS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/?p=45575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/06/28/the_court_rules_obamacare_is_the_largest_tax_increase_in_the_history_of_the_world">The Court Rules: Obamacare is the Largest Tax Increase in the History of the World</a> - Rush Limbaugh   “And we, the American people, have just been deceived in ways that nobody contemplated.  And what we now have is the biggest tax increase in the history of the world.  What we have been told by the chief justice of the Supreme Court and four liberals on the court: Obamacare is just a massive tax increase.  <a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45575">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/06/28/the_court_rules_obamacare_is_the_largest_tax_increase_in_the_history_of_the_world">The Court Rules: Obamacare is the Largest Tax Increase in the History of the World</a> &#8211; Rush Limbaugh   “And we, the American people, have just been deceived in ways that nobody contemplated.  And what we now have is the biggest tax increase in the history of the world.  What we have been told by the chief justice of the Supreme Court and four liberals on the court: Obamacare is just a massive tax increase.  That&#8217;s all it is.  Obama lied to us about that.  The Democrats lied. ‘It wasn&#8217;t a tax. There was no way it was a tax.&#8217; &#8230; So Obamacare is nothing more than the largest tax increase in the history of the world.  And the people who were characterizing it as such were right and were telling the truth.  We have the biggest tax increase in the history of the world right in the middle of one of this country&#8217;s worst recessions.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/blogs/print/304329">The New and Even Worse Obamacare</a> &#8211; National Review   “The political case for repealing Obamacare, which has always been the most significant and relevant case, is stronger than ever after today’s decision. Left alone, the law will spend well over a trillion dollars in the coming decade on yet another health-care entitlement program and on the expansion of existing entitlements, micromanage the insurance industry in ways likely to make it even less efficient, employ even heavier price controls of the sort that have always failed in Medicare, and raise half a trillion dollars in taxes on employment, investment, and medical research. And now we know that its tax bill will be even higher than we thought, and that its reduction of the uninsured even smaller. Today’s decision just means that President Obama must now embrace this monstrosity even tighter, and that the case for replacing him has grown even clearer and more powerful.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/gop-governors-vow-to-ignore-obamacare/article/2500862">GOP Governors Vow to Ignore Obamacare</a> &#8211; Washington Examiner   “RGA Chairman Bob McDonnell said, ‘Today&#8217;s ruling crystallizes all that&#8217;s at stake in November&#8217;s election. The only way to stop Barack Obama&#8217;s budget-busting health care takeover is by electing a new president. Barack Obama&#8217;s health care takeover encapsulates his presidency: Obamacare increases taxes, grows the size of government and puts bureaucrats over patients while doing nothing to improve the economy.’”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2012/06/28/supreme-court-upholds-healthcare-law-what-it-means/">Supreme Court Upholds Obamacare: What It Means, What Happens Next</a> – Forbes   “An invigorated Republican Party: Having survived the Supreme Court, Obamacare is now before the voters in the November elections. Republicans will use this to push for victory so they can repeal the law, which is opposed in some measure by more than 60% of voters.  If they win, they face the challenge of fulfilling those promises without angering voters by eliminating popular provisions like the elimination of pre-existing conditions and lifetime policy caps, no-copayment checkups, and coverage for children up to the age of 26.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45575/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare Is Now the Obama Tax</title>
		<link>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45658</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45658#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WhatAmIMissingHere</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov't Econ Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation and Deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POLITICAL CARTOONS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. and World Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/?p=45658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45658"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="200" src="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/109155-Obama-Care-Mega-Millions-by-Brian-Fairrington-Cagle-Cartoons-515x369.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="Obama Care Mega Millions by Brian Fairrington, Cagle Cartoons" title="Obama Care Mega Millions by Brian Fairrington, Cagle Cartoons" /></a><a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/40502/109155-obama-care-mega-millions-by-brian-fairrington-cagle-cartoons" rel="attachment wp-att-40501"></a>

By Mac Slavo

It’s official. President George Bush’s Supreme Court appointee Chief Justice John Roberts has sided with the liberal-leaning members of the court and upheld the key provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

While the government can’t force Americans to buy any particular good or service, the Supreme Court’s landmark decision essentially says that your failure to purchase health care will require a tax penalty, thus leaving you with no other <a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45658">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/40502/109155-obama-care-mega-millions-by-brian-fairrington-cagle-cartoons" rel="attachment wp-att-40501"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-40501" title="Obama Care Mega Millions by Brian Fairrington, Cagle Cartoons" src="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/109155-Obama-Care-Mega-Millions-by-Brian-Fairrington-Cagle-Cartoons-515x369.jpg" alt="Obama Care Mega Millions by Brian Fairrington, Cagle Cartoons" width="515" height="369" /></a></p>
<p>By Mac Slavo</p>
<p>It’s official. President George Bush’s Supreme Court appointee Chief Justice John Roberts has sided with the liberal-leaning members of the court and upheld the key provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.</p>
<p>While the government can’t force Americans to buy any particular good or service, <strong>the Supreme Court’s landmark decision essentially says that your failure to purchase health care will require a tax penalty, thus leaving you with no other option if you want to avoid being taxed.</strong></p>
<p>As bad as this is, a long-time White House Insider doesn’t necessarily see this is a complete loss for individual responsibility and liberty<strong>, but rather, a motivator that will catalyze opposition to Obama’s reelection hopes</strong>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>And the initial <strong>reports I’m getting are telling me there was a lot more clever going on inside that decision than the initial reaction will indicate</strong>. </em><strong><em>It’s the Obama Tax now.</em></strong><em><strong>  And states were given an out.  </strong></em><strong><em>The entire law is a big ass convoluted mess and the ruling has reinforced that fact.</em></strong><em><strong>  Obama will have to defend something he doesn’t understand, and Romney can now sit back and just repeat over and over again “repeal-repeal-repeal”.</strong></em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>You can call bullsh-t on me here and I’ll understand if you <strong>do but I’m telling you right up this ruling today is GOOD NEWS.  Politically,  as a motivator, it’s great news. </strong> Watch contributions toward Republicans jump up even more than they already were.  <strong>Watch the Obama White House have to face very hard questions over the Obamacare tax issue.  Watch states rise up to challenge the administration using the weapon the Supreme Court placed in their hands to do so. Watch the Tea Party come back stronger and more powerful than ever.</strong></em><strong></strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The giant has woken up.  Country needed a hard kick in the ass to remind us what is at stake in November.  Now we are truly ready to fight.</span></em></strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Source: </em><a href="http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/06/28/white-house-insider-obamacare-now-we-are-truly-ready-to-fight/" target="_blank"><em>The Ulsterman Report</em></a></p>
<p>A large percentage of Americans were already up in arms about the prospect of being forced to purchase health care. <strong>Now that it’s clear that what is happening is another government mandated tax, we suspect a massive outcry leading into the election.    </strong>(my emphasis)</p>
<p>We are not, however, convinced that a President Romney administration would act to end Obamacare if they are victorious in November, though his campaign is already calling for repeal.</p>
<p>By Mac Slavo for SHTF Plan</p>
<p>By permission Mac Slavo</p>
<p><a href="http://www.shtfplan.com">www.shtfplan.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45658/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Informative Links for June 29, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45573</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45573#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WhatAmIMissingHere</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[INFORMATIVE LINKS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/?p=45573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/romney-if-we-want-get-rid-obamacare-were-going-have-replace-ppresident-obama_647937.html">Romney: 'If We Want to Get Rid of Obamacare, We're Going to Have to Replace President Obama'</a> - Weekly Standard   "'Let’s make clear that we understand what the Court did and did not do,' Romney said today, speaking in Washington, D.C. 'What the Court did today was say that Obamacare does not violate the Constitution. What they did not do was say that Obamacare is good law or that it's good policy.' Romney added: <a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45573">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/romney-if-we-want-get-rid-obamacare-were-going-have-replace-ppresident-obama_647937.html">Romney: &#8216;If We Want to Get Rid of Obamacare, We&#8217;re Going to Have to Replace President Obama&#8217;</a> &#8211; Weekly Standard   &#8220;&#8216;Let’s make clear that we understand what the Court did and did not do,&#8217; Romney said today, speaking in Washington, D.C. &#8216;What the Court did today was say that Obamacare does not violate the Constitution. What they did not do was say that Obamacare is good law or that it&#8217;s good policy.&#8217; Romney added: &#8216;Obamacare was bad policy yesterday. It&#8217;s bad policy today. Obamacare was bad law yesterday. It’s bad law today.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77946.html#ixzz1z6sT59Qt">Rubio: IRS to &#8216;Come After&#8217; Uninsured</a> – Politico   &#8220;&#8216;I hope people back home fully understand what this means, and here’s what this means: It is now unlawful for you not to buy health insurance, and if you do not buy it, you have an IRS problem,&#8217; the Florida Republican said on Fox News. &#8216;If you do not buy health insurance, the IRS is going to be on your back and chasing you. They’re going to take away your refund, they’re going to increase your fees, they’re going to come after you.&#8217;”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/06/28/supreme-court-surprise-obamacare/">The Supreme Court’s Surprise</a> – Commentary   “Judging by the signs being carried, the overwhelming majority of the crowd outside the Court this morning was anti-ObamaCare. With the upholding of the mandate, ObamaCare survives. For now. But I suspect the already energized anti-Obama forces in this year’s election will now be supercharged. The only way to get rid of this deeply pernicious piece of legislation will be to get rid of Obama. Requiring all candidates for federal office to sign a promise to repeal ObamaCare as a precondition of support would be a starter.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/japans-debt-addiction-creating-mother-125625453.html">Japan&#8217;s Debt Addiction Creating &#8216;Mother of All Bubbles&#8217;</a> – CNBC   “He adds that currently half of the government&#8217;s revenue goes to paying the interest rate on these bonds. &#8216;It doesn&#8217;t take a rocket scientist to work that if those rates start ticking up, for whatever bizarre reason, you may see the Japanese government spending 100 percent of its tax take on pure interest-rate servicing and that&#8217;s a very dangerous position to be in,&#8217; McFadden said.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45573/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Huge Supreme Court Win is Actually a Poison Pill for Taxer-in-Chief Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45643</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45643#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WhatAmIMissingHere</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov't Econ Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation and Deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POLITICAL CARTOONS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. and World Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/?p=45643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45643"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="200" src="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/114272-Obamacare-Tax-by-Rick-McKee-The-Augusta-Chronicle-515x333.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="Obamacare Tax by Rick McKee, The Augusta Chronicle" title="Obamacare Tax by Rick McKee, The Augusta Chronicle" /></a><a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45643/114272-obamacare-tax-by-rick-mckee-the-augusta-chronicle" rel="attachment wp-att-45642"></a>

By Wayne Allyn Root

I’ll admit I wanted to see Obamacare struck down by the Supreme Court. Yet I rooted for this outcome with trepidation. Because the loser of this decision would gain the edge in the election. Why? Simple. Voters are motivated by fear, anger, shock, and outrage. 

Just like consumers. Rarely does a consumer ever contact a business owner like me to tell me how great my business or products are. <a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45643">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45643/114272-obamacare-tax-by-rick-mckee-the-augusta-chronicle" rel="attachment wp-att-45642"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-45642" title="Obamacare Tax by Rick McKee, The Augusta Chronicle" src="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/114272-Obamacare-Tax-by-Rick-McKee-The-Augusta-Chronicle-515x333.jpg" alt="Obamacare Tax by Rick McKee, The Augusta Chronicle" width="515" height="333" /></a></p>
<p>By Wayne Allyn Root</p>
<p>I’ll admit I wanted to see Obamacare struck down by the Supreme Court. Yet I rooted for this outcome with trepidation. <strong>Because the loser of this decision would gain the edge in the election. Why? <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Simple. Voters are motivated by fear, anger, shock, and outrage</span>. </strong></p>
<p>Just like consumers. <strong>Rarely does a consumer ever contact a business owner like me to tell me how great my business or products are. Almost 100% of letters, emails, and calls a business owner receives involve complaints. It’s always been that way. Whether you’re talking about voters, consumers, or citizens exercising their rights. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Have you ever seen citizens mobilizing and showing up at City Hall meetings in force to say they are happy with the Mayor and the City Council? It has never happened. It never will</strong>. But if the garbage isn’t picked up fast enough, if the snow isn’t plowed fast enough, if the zoning is changed in a way that hurts property values- WOW, do you have protests and outrage! <strong>People who are happy are just not motivated to get off the couch and take action. Only anger works to motivate people to do something…to shout…to make calls…to go door to door…to organize protests…to vote…to contribute. So in politics the edge goes to the angry electorate.</strong></p>
<p><strong>So today’s Supreme Court ruling might seem to be a victory for Obama, but in reality it is the worst possible outcome for him<span style="text-decoration: underline;">. Conservative voters will now be on the warpath and come out in droves on election day. </span>The party with the anger is the party with the edge.</strong></p>
<p>But far worse is the actual decision and how it makes Obama look<strong>. He didn’t win healthcare for the people. He won a giant new tax. Don’t take my word for it. Just ask the Supreme Court. How appropriate. Barack Obama will now go down in the history books as the Great Taxer in Chief.</strong> <strong>His signature victory was just ruled a tax bill by the Supreme Court, not a health or commerce bill. Americans hate taxe</strong>s. They throw big taxers out of office. Heck, we fought an entire revolution over tiny taxes on tea! Obama just became “the King of Taxes” with his smashing tax victory<strong>. He will go down in history as the greatest taxer ever in the White House for his signature tax victory. Get it? Obama and the word “taxes” are forever tied together. He isn’t Barack Hussein Obama anymore. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">He is Barack Taxes Obama.</span></strong></p>
<p>By the way, liberals, big government proponents and the Obama administration (I know, I repeat myself) didn’t win big on Thursday. <strong>They lost on the commerce clause aspect of this decision- which means government cannot throw every bit of commerce for the rest of all time under their authority. That’s a loss. </strong></p>
<p><strong>And they lost on the Medicaid expansion- which is a victory for States’ Rights.</strong></p>
<p>All in all, a hollow victory for Barack Taxes Obama. <strong>In the long run, I’m betting it’s a victory he’ll wish he lost.    </strong>(my emphasis)</p>
<p>By Wayne Allyn Root</p>
<p>By permission Wayne Allyn Root</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rootforamerica.com">www.rootforamerica.com</a><strong></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Wayne Allyn Root is a Capitalist Evangelist and serial entrepreneur. He is a former Libertarian vice presidential nominee. He now serves as Chairman of the Libertarian National Campaign Committee. He is the best-selling author of “The Conscience of a Libertarian: Empowering the Citizen Revolution with God, Guns, Gold &amp; Tax Cuts.” His web site: www.ROOTforAmerica.com</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45643/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comments about Today’s Obamacare Ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45578</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45578#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Kneafsey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov't Econ Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation and Deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. and World Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHAT AM I MISSING HERE? (WAIMH)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/?p=45578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45578"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="200" src="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/87535-What-is-in-Obamacare-by-Eric-Allie-Caglecartoons-515x356.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="What is in Obamacare by Eric Allie, Caglecartoons" title="What is in Obamacare by Eric Allie, Caglecartoons" /></a><a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/30275/87535-what-is-in-obamacare-by-eric-allie-caglecartoons" rel="attachment wp-att-30273"></a>

By Jack Kneafsey

After letting the dust settle somewhat from today’s Supreme Court ruling on Obamacare, I thought you might find the following comments and links to these comments to be helpful and informative:

<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304898704577480371370927862.html">Supreme Court Upholds Mandate as Tax</a> - Wall Street Journal
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">“Although the law survived the court challenge, it faces an uncertain future. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and GOP congressional leaders have pledged to repeal the law if <a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45578">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/30275/87535-what-is-in-obamacare-by-eric-allie-caglecartoons" rel="attachment wp-att-30273"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-30273" title="What is in Obamacare by Eric Allie, Caglecartoons" src="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/87535-What-is-in-Obamacare-by-Eric-Allie-Caglecartoons-515x356.jpg" alt="What is in Obamacare by Eric Allie, Caglecartoons" width="515" height="356" /></a></p>
<p>By Jack Kneafsey</p>
<p>After letting the dust settle somewhat from today’s Supreme Court ruling on Obamacare, I thought you might find the following comments and links to these comments to be helpful and informative:</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304898704577480371370927862.html">Supreme Court Upholds Mandate as Tax</a> &#8211; Wall Street Journal</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">“Although the law survived the court challenge, it faces an uncertain future. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and GOP congressional leaders have pledged to repeal the law if they take control of Congress and the White House in November elections.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The court&#8217;s decision, while a relief to Democrats, could further energize voters who dislike the law to back Republicans in November. And it forces the Obama administration to continue defending the unpopular insurance mandate.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/election-just-became-about-obamacare_647928.html">This Election Just Became About Obamacare</a> &#8211; Weekly Standard<strong></strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>“</strong>In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision upholding the constitutionality of Obamacare, the principal choice now facing Americans on November 6 will be whether to keep Obamacare or to repeal it.  The question is a binary one, and the answer — expressed almost entirely through their presidential vote — will go a long way toward determining the future course of this great nation.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes, the economy is extremely important; and, yes, Obamacare is hurting the economy. But the reason why this election is the most important since the Civil War is not because Mitt Romney would make a far better steward of the economy than President Obama (though he would). Rather, it’s because we are about to decide whether to put what will soon be one-fifth of our economy under the control of the federal govern.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://spectator.org/blog/2012/06/28/obamacare-ruling-will-fuel-201">Obamacare Ruling Will Fuel 2010-Like Conservative Fervor</a> &#8211; American Spectator</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">“ … the Supreme Court victory comes at significant political cost to President Obama. Chief Justice John Roberts managed to uphold Obamacare apart from the Commerce Clause by calling it a tax — a tax that will constitute a mammoth increase on the middle class. Not a good selling point in an election year. Romney has a golden opportunity to exploit Obamacare as a tax hike, and he has the Supreme Court as his source.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mcconnell.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=PressReleases&amp;ContentRecord_id=7fc835cd-28a3-44bf-9903-4f8cbbdbff5e&amp;ContentType_id=c19bc7a5-2bb9-4a73-b2ab-3c1b5191a72b&amp;Group_id=0fd6ddca-6a05-4b26-8710-a0b7b59a8f1f&amp;MonthDisplay=6&amp;YearDisplay=2012">McConnell Calls For Full Repeal of Obamacare</a> &#8211; McConnell</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">“This bill was sold to the American people on a deception. But it’s not just that the promises about this law weren’t kept. It’s that it’s made the problems it was meant to solve even worse.”</p>
<p><a href="http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/06/28/supreme-court-rules-on-obamas-health-care-law/">Chief Justice Roberts Provides Swing Vote to Uphold Health Care Law</a> &#8211; CBS News</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>“</strong>But the court said the mandate can be construed as a tax. “Because the Constitution permits such a tax, <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">it is not our role to forbid it, or to pass upon its wisdom or fairness,”</span></strong> Roberts said.     (my emphasis)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45578/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Message to Europe: Government Spending IS Austerity</title>
		<link>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45434</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45434#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WhatAmIMissingHere</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov't Econ Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation and Deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POLITICAL CARTOONS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. and World Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/?p=45434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45434"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="200" src="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/112218-Rejecting-Austerity-in-Europe-by-RJ-Matson-The-St.-Louis-Post-Dispatch-515x360.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="Rejecting Austerity in Europe by RJ Matson, The St. Louis Post Dispatch" title=" Rejecting Austerity in Europe by RJ Matson, The St. Louis Post Dispatch" /></a><a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/44507/112218-rejecting-austerity-in-europe-by-rj-matson-the-st-louis-post-dispatch" rel="attachment wp-att-44479"></a>

By John Tamny
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">"General Lucius Clay, postwar Governor of the U.S. military zone in Germany, remarked to Finance Minister Erhard, ‘My advisors tell me that you should not try to balance the budget, but should engage in deficit spending.' To this Erhard replied, ‘My advisors tell me the same thing, but we are not going to do it. We intend to balance our budget, not to incur any indebtedness, to avoid <a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45434">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/44507/112218-rejecting-austerity-in-europe-by-rj-matson-the-st-louis-post-dispatch" rel="attachment wp-att-44479"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-44479" title=" Rejecting Austerity in Europe by RJ Matson, The St. Louis Post Dispatch" src="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/112218-Rejecting-Austerity-in-Europe-by-RJ-Matson-The-St.-Louis-Post-Dispatch-515x360.jpg" alt="Rejecting Austerity in Europe by RJ Matson, The St. Louis Post Dispatch" width="515" height="360" /></a></p>
<p>By John Tamny</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;General Lucius Clay, postwar Governor of the U.S. military zone in Germany, remarked to Finance Minister Erhard, ‘My advisors tell me that you should not try to balance the budget, but should engage in deficit spending.&#8217; To this Erhard replied, ‘My advisors tell me the same thing, but we are not going to do it<strong>. We intend to balance our budget, not to incur any indebtedness, to avoid inflation and keep the mark stable and sound.&#8221;</strong></em> &#8211; Howard E. Kershner, <em>Dividing the Wealth</em>, p. 135.</p>
<p>A <em>Wall Street Journal</em> headline from last month, &#8220;Europe, in Slump, Rethinks Austerity&#8221;, captures well the binary view of economic growth at the moment: spend or recess. With seven Eurozone nations technically in recession, <strong>it&#8217;s widely assumed within the mainstream economic commentariat that absent heavy government spending, recession will be the rule.</strong></p>
<p><strong>What&#8217;s ironic about this broad supposition is how divorced from reality it actually is. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">For one, it&#8217;s fair to say that austerity of the spending cut variety hasn&#8217;t even been tried yet.</span></strong></p>
<p>Indeed, as economist Richard Rahn recently wrote<strong>, &#8220;government spending has risen as a share of gross domestic product (GDP) in all of the major economies.&#8221; It&#8217;s assumed that government spending has declined, but as Rahn clarifies, governments have been active participants in efforts to revive country economies.</strong> Despite all the government spending, the outlook in Europe remains bleak.</p>
<p><strong>Government Spending Still Doesn&#8217;t Stimulate</strong></p>
<p>To regular readers of this column, none of what&#8217;s coming to pass should surprise. It&#8217;s perhaps shooting fish in a barrel at this point, <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">but governments have no resources. And because they have no resources, in order for governments to spend they must necessarily tax or borrow precious resources from the very private sector that generates all economic growth.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>Not only is every dollar, euro or yen spent by governments one less of each that could potentially be deployed by private market actors disciplined by profit and loss, it&#8217;s also the case that government stimulus spending ignores the tautological reality that production is the driver of the growth and consumption that so transfixes economists.</strong> Wealth merely changes hands when governments presume to stimulate through spending, whereas true government spending cuts remove actually barriers to production for more capital being left in the private sector to fund real economic activity.</p>
<p><strong>For draining so much limited capital from the private economy it could be argued that what economists refer to as &#8220;stimulus&#8221; is in fact an economic somnolent, or true &#8220;austerity,&#8221; and recent years confirm the latter supposition</strong>. Figure the Obama administration has overseen large government spending increases and record deficits, yet the rate of unemployment in the U.S. remains well above what it would be if the economy were truly growing.</p>
<p>Worse, at 8.2%, <strong>unemployment has only fallen insofar as the labor force participation rate has declined</strong>.  As frequent RealClearMarkets contributor Louis Woodhill has calculated, <strong>if labor force participation were as high as it was when George W. Bush left office (65.8%), unemployment today would be 11.2%. If the labor force participation rate were as high today as it was in April of 2000, U.S. unemployment would be 13.2%.</strong></p>
<p>Considering the limp outlook for the U.S. economy<strong>, it&#8217;s well past time to more forcefully point fingers at the very government spending encouraged by so many economists as a necessary driver of rebirth. Certainly if government spending were a source of economic energy we&#8217;d be reading about substantial growth in profligate spending Europe and the U.S., yet the outlook for both remains rather depressed.</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The good news, both for government finances and for economic growth, is that substantial reductions in government spending are actually very stimulative</span></strong>. There are two U.S. examples supporting the latter claim, along with one from post-WWII Germany, that should encourage those bothered by deficit spending that doesn&#8217;t seem to be achieving anything to begin with.</p>
<p><strong>Governmental Parsimony Is Itself a Stimulant</strong></p>
<p>Considering the U.S., though federal deficit spending during World War II rose to 120 percent of GDP, the collapse in outlays (from $84 billion in 1945 to $30 billion in 1946) after the war did not drive the economy into recession. As economists Jason Taylor and Richard Vedder wrote in 2010, <strong>&#8220;The ‘Depression of 1946&#8242; may be one of the most widely predicted events that never happened in American history.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Simple logic would have predicted a major economic rebound. Not only do government spending cuts leave more funds in the private sector, but war itself is the opposite of stimulus for the humans that drive economic advancement killing each other, as opposed to producing for one another harmoniously.</p>
<p>With the de-mobilization of U.S. troops after the war a September 1945 <em><strong>BusinessWeek</strong></em><strong> predicted an unemployment rate of 14%, but in fact unemployment averaged 4.5% in the first three postwar year</strong>s. Far from an aimless economy without the alleged stimulus that was war, the U.S. economy quickly absorbed troops released from the military as evidenced by the low rate of joblessness.</p>
<p>Traveling backwards in time to 1920-21, the U.S. economy contracted substantially then too. But just as Americans aren&#8217;t aware of a post-WWII &#8220;recession&#8221; that never was, so are most seemingly unaware that Americans suffered a brutal downturn not too long after the end of World War I.</p>
<p>Perhaps one reason so few are aware of the early ‘20s downturn has do with how short it was. Notably, and contrary to popular economic opinion today which says governments must spend economies out of slumps, federal spending declined from $6.4 billion in fiscal year 1920 to $3.3 billion in 1923. Classical economic theory prevailed in the early ‘20s, the federal government got out of the way, essentially reducing its spending burden on the U.S. economy, and the latter roared.</p>
<p>Considering West Germany in the aftermath of World War II, Howard Kershner observed in <em>Dividing the Wealth</em> that &#8220;This unfortunate country had been more nearly destroyed than any other in Europe. She had suffered the loss of many millions of her strongest young men, and had seen a great part of her homes, factories and business buildings destroyed&#8230;..In spite of all these handicaps, in a few short years Germany became the most prosperous country in Europe.&#8221; Yet as the quote which begins this piece reveals in living color, <strong>West Germany revived itself despite keeping its budget in balance. There&#8217;s seemingly a pattern to light government spending and booming economic growth, yet modern economists don&#8217;t much pay it heed.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The Euro Isn&#8217;t to Blame</strong></p>
<p>Of course some blame the euro itself for Europe&#8217;s problems. It&#8217;s believed by euro naysayers that absent a fiscal union to match the currency union, that the euro was doomed from the start. Here lies a grave misunderstanding about the purpose of money.</p>
<p><strong>Put simply, money is not wealth, rather money is facilitator of the exchange of real wealth. A euro accepted across many countries would almost by definition enhance the trade that defines wealth exchange for exchange rate risk being removed to some degree as a factor.</strong></p>
<p>As for there not existing fiscal union in concert with currency union, that criticism of the euro has no relevance. <strong>Figure the dollar is an accepted unit of account across 50 states with 50 different fiscal policies. Rather than a hindrance, the common dollar has surely been a help when it&#8217;s come to the evolution and growth of the U.S. economy.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Conclusion </strong></p>
<p><strong>The European economy is far less complicated than most would like to believe</strong>. Though its struggles are blamed on governmental austerity and a common currency that doesn&#8217;t account for differing country economies, neither assumption stands up to the most basic of scrutiny.</p>
<p>Money is a merely a facilitator of the real product-for-product wealth exchange that actually occurs when individuals transact. Though the euro would ideally be stronger, and as such a lure for investment into the Eurozone, its existence as a common currency can only redound to Eurozone growth for exchange rate risk somewhat disappearing as a factor. <strong>Just as the U.S. economy would be much weaker if there were 50 currencies for all 50 states, it&#8217;s hard to credibly argue that Europe would be better off with a different currency for each of its countries</strong>.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">As for &#8220;austerity,&#8221; though the word conjures up slow growth in the minds of many, economic history reveals spending restraint as a stimulant. Indeed, the problem today in a recessed Europe isn&#8217;t governmental austerity, but the unsung reality that the latter hasn&#8217;t yet been tried.</span></strong><strong>    </strong>(my emphasis)<strong> </strong></p>
<p>By John Tamny for Real Clear Markets</p>
<p>By permission John Tamny</p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclearmarkets.com">www.realclearmarkets.com</a></p>
<p><em>John Tamny is editor of RealClearMarkets and </em><a href="http://www.forbes.com/opinions"><em>Forbes Opinions</em></a><em>, a senior economic adviser to H.C. Wainwright Economics, and a senior economic adviser to Toreador Research and Trading (</em><a href="http://www.trtadvisors.com"><em>www.trtadvisors.com</em></a><em>). </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45434/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Informative Links for June 28, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45499</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45499#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WhatAmIMissingHere</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[INFORMATIVE LINKS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/?p=45499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/06/27/democrats-afraid-to-be-seen-with-obama/">Democrats Afraid to Be Seen with Obama?</a> -  Commentary   “So it is surely a sign of something close to panic that Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee head Steve Israel is publicly advising Democrats to stay home from President Obama’s nominating convention this year. ... The most notable of these Democrats was Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill, whose declaration that she would be caught nowhere near the president’s convention seems to have spooked her party into making <a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45499">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/06/27/democrats-afraid-to-be-seen-with-obama/">Democrats Afraid to Be Seen with Obama?</a> &#8211;  Commentary   “So it is surely a sign of something close to panic that Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee head Steve Israel is publicly advising Democrats to stay home from President Obama’s nominating convention this year. &#8230; The most notable of these Democrats was Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill, whose declaration that she would be caught nowhere near the president’s convention seems to have spooked her party into making a monumental unforced error.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/biden-its-a-depression-for-millions-and-mil#HTWF2">Biden: &#8220;It&#8217;s A Depression For Millions And Millions Of Americans&#8221;</a> &#8211; Buzz Feed   “Biden pushing middle-class, jobs: ‘it&#8217;s depression for millions and millions of americans’ searching for work.&#8221;   I have just one question relating to this: how can these comments possibly correlate to Obama&#8217;s recent statement that &#8220;the private sector is doing fine&#8221;?</p>
<p><a href="http://ca.news.yahoo.com/war-words-heats-over-u-gun-walking-case-034703052.html">Holder Faces House Contempt Vote on Gun Probe</a> – Reuters    “U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder faces a contempt vote by the House of Representatives on Thursday in a dispute involving a botched gun-running probe, and the chamber&#8217;s top Democrat, Nancy Pelosi, said some in her party may line up with Republicans against him.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2012/06/25/time-to-occupy-the-pension-funds/">Time to Occupy State Pensions?</a> &#8211; American Interest   “The biggest scam going in American financial life may be the collusive effort by Wall Street, the political class, and public sector unions to use union retirement money to prop up Wall Street speculation. That the public unions are in effect fighting to retain the ‘freedom’ to put worker pension money in high risk, high fee assets is an indication of just how intellectually and politically bankrupt much of the American public sector labor movement has become.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45499/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Frying Pan to Fire</title>
		<link>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/44806</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/44806#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WhatAmIMissingHere</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOLD & SILVER COMMENTARY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation and Deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POLITICAL CARTOONS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. and World Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/?p=44806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/44806"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="200" src="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/95998-Consensus-over-Debt-by-Paresh-Nath-The-Khaleej-Times-UAE-515x386.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="Consensus over Debt by Paresh Nath, The Khaleej Times, UAE" title="Consensus over Debt by Paresh Nath, The Khaleej Times, UAE" /></a><a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/31331/95998-consensus-over-debt-by-paresh-nath-the-khaleej-times-uae" rel="attachment wp-att-31335"></a>

By Andy Sutton

Recently, the Treasury Department almost gleefully and proudly announced that foreign holdings of US Debt had hit a record high during the month of April and that bond heavyweight China had upped its holdings after trimming for two straight months. This dovetails nicely with a story that was published earlier this week about the federal reserve and its own holdings of US Debt, which have increased over 450% in the <a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/44806">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/31331/95998-consensus-over-debt-by-paresh-nath-the-khaleej-times-uae" rel="attachment wp-att-31335"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-31335" title="Consensus over Debt by Paresh Nath, The Khaleej Times, UAE" src="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/95998-Consensus-over-Debt-by-Paresh-Nath-The-Khaleej-Times-UAE-515x386.jpg" alt="Consensus over Debt by Paresh Nath, The Khaleej Times, UAE" width="515" height="386" /></a></p>
<p>By Andy Sutton</p>
<p><strong>Recently, the Treasury Department almost gleefully and proudly announced that foreign holdings of US Debt had hit a record high during the month of April and that bond heavyweight China had upped its holdings after trimming for two straight months</strong>. This dovetails nicely with a story that was published earlier this week about the <strong>federal reserve and its own holdings of US Debt, which have increased over 450% in the past three years. And no, that is not a typo. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The federal reserve now holds over $1.6 Trillion in USGovt debt</span>. </strong>Obviously the establishment is thrilled with these developments because it helps maintain the status quo of the dollar standard era. However, there are some serious ramifications that few are paying attention to and are getting almost zero coverage from traditional media outlets. From the AP this morning:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong><em>“China boosted its holdings 0.1 percent to $1.15 trillion in April. That followed a 1 percent drop in March and a 0.9 percent decline in February. March&#8217;s figures were revised down from the government&#8217;s initial estimate a month ago that China had boosted its holdings in March. </em></strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong><em>Japan, the second-largest buyer of Treasury debt, trimmed its holdings 0.9 percent to $1.07 trillion. Brazil, the third-largest buyer of Treasury debt, boosted its holdings 5.3 percent to $246.7 billion.”</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>The US Government and its catastrophic fiscal morass are now viewed by the world as a ‘safe haven’? This would easily qualify for a comedy shtick if it weren’t so serious.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Where is the ‘Eurozone Effect’ in US Govt Debt?</strong></p>
<p>The headlines have been filled with story after story about how the major rating agencies (S&amp;P, Moody’s and Fitch in particular) have been literally wrecking EU nations for their inability to get a handle on their fiscal affairs. This has created a self-reinforcing cycle. Agencies cut the ratings, which prompts bond investors to demand higher yields, which makes it even less likely that the nations will be able to meet payment obligations, which leads to further downgrades and so forth. Wash, rinse, repeat. Not only have the nations themselves been hit, but their banks have been hit as well – and deservedly so. <strong>In truth, the entire Eurozone, save for Germany, should be rated below investment-grade; and quite a few of them should be rated as junk.</strong></p>
<p>Which brings us to America<strong>. The inability of our government to do much of anything without further borrowing is now well documented. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Uncle Sam borrows nearly 50 cents of every dollar spent</span>, and despite massive stimulus via heavy deficit spending, the USEconomy is dead in the water.</strong> There is a huge paradigm shift going on in the labor market right now. Jobs are available, but for the most part they’re of the variety of which two (or more) are needed to create a manageable situation for a family. <strong>Families are back on the credit card and this writer must wonder how much of that debt accumulation is out of necessity rather than a need for largesse</strong>. There is a bubble in student loan debt and both Social Security and Medicare are in serious trouble. Last August S&amp;P, citing these and other factors, dropped the government’s rating a single notch. Generally when ratings go down, yields go up. Quite the opposite has happened in our case. Yields are now at all-time lows.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/44806/euro-zone-credit-rating-charts" rel="attachment wp-att-44802"><img class="size-full wp-image-44802 aligncenter" title="Euro Zone Credit Rating Charts" src="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Euro-Zone-Credit-Rating-Charts.jpg" alt="Euro Zone Credit Rating Charts" width="500" height="334" /></a><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>The False Paradigm Continues</strong></p>
<p>First, this continues and even reinforces the notion that America is somehow immune from the laws of economics (and common sense for that matter). Somehow we can borrow and spend as much money as we want without fear of negative repercussions. In fact, not only won’t we be punished, we’ll be rewarded by having to pay lower interest rates. Does it make any sense though that the average credit card rate for individuals is somewhere in the mid 13% range and the average American’s finances – as bad as they are – are still several orders of magnitude better than that of the US Govt, which is treated to the lowest rates in history?</p>
<p><strong>Make no mistake about it; the bubble blowing up in USTreasuries is the mother of all bubbles to date, eclipsed only by the even larger bubble being blown up in OTC derivatives, which almost NOBODY is talking about. In plain English, this will not end well – enjoy it while it lasts.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Why Save?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Secondly, the near-zero interest rates being paid by banks and other savings vehicles are so low that it actually discourages people from saving when they need to be doing it most</strong>. I had the severe displeasure of scanning rates on money market funds for a client the other day and found that the average of the handful of money market funds I looked at was .06%. That is six cents a year for every hundred dollars invested. Incredible. And when you figure that veritable fortune is taxed? Well, what’s the point of even saving? Unfortunately, many people are taking that attitude. If we’re not going to be compensated, why bother? <strong>A quick look at the savings averages for people nearing retirement is downright scary. Granted, this has been going on an awful long time. People appear to be under the false notion that the government is going to take care of them and that their Social Security (which is anything but) will carry them through. Many are now finding out the hard way that this simply isn’t the case. </strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/44806/savers-pummeled-graph" rel="attachment wp-att-44803"><img class="size-full wp-image-44803 aligncenter" title="Savers Pummeled Graph" src="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Savers-Pummeled-Graph.jpg" alt="Savers Pummeled Graph" width="500" height="311" /></a></p>
<p><strong>We are Europe</strong></p>
<p>Thirdly, the persistently poor economy, which by several authentic non-GDP based metrics has now been in recession for nearly 6 years, <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">has created and entire class of people who are dependent on the government for either all or nearly all of their sustenance</span></strong>. Social Security Disability claims are at an all-time high. Food stamp subscriptions are at an all-time high, as are energy assistance, and Medicaid use. <strong>We are Europe, plain and simple. While our politicians and Mr. Geithner sit here and lecture the Europeans on fiscal responsibility, we’ve got our very own Titanic that is listing from a huge gash in its side caused by the overriding welfare mentality and a complete lack of leadership over the past half century.</strong> Much like many of the Eurozone nation-states, <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">we have lost our own sense of personal responsibility</span>. Somebody else will take care of it. Someone else will pay for it. Someone else will clean up our mess.</strong></p>
<p><strong>As the money flies out of Greek banks and the Eurozone in general so fast that it can barely be counted, there aren’t a lot of viable places to stash it. One must wonder where it is all going</strong>. Global stock markets have been in a correction over the past month or so. Commodities are stagnant as financial agents attack prices at every turn in a vain attempt to contain the effects of all the monetary inflation going on around the globe. <strong>USTreasuries have been one parking place, but really, given the fundamentals of America’s finances, stashing your capital in USTreasuries is the equivalent of jumping from the frying pan directly into the fire.</strong></p>
<p>This is where the final component of the false paradigm comes into play: <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">the complete lack of moral hazard.</span></strong> <strong>The bailout mentality, like the welfare mentality, is firmly in place</strong>. We taught banks and hedge funds back in 2008 (and even before) <strong>that the USTaxpayer is always willing, able, and ready to back up any losses experienced as a result of poor risk management, gambling, and outright irresponsible behavior. We’ve taught people that they can behave irresponsibly and buy homes they have no hope of ever affording and while millions have lost those homes, millions more have been bailed out</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>The real question becomes who is going to do the bailing out when the USTreasury and OTC Derivative bubbles burst? There isn’t enough capital in America to cover the Treasury mess and <span style="text-decoration: underline;">there isn’t enough capital in the universe to cover the OTC casino gambling of financial agents around the globe. Got gold? </span></strong>     (my emphasis)</p>
<p>By Andrew W. Sutton, MBA, Chief Market Strategist, Sutton &amp; Associates, LLC</p>
<p>By permission Andy Sutton</p>
<p><a title="blocked::http://www.sutton-associates.net/" href="http://www.sutton-associates.net/">http://www.sutton-associates.net</a></p>
<p>Sutton &amp; Associates, LLC is a Registered Investment Adviser in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/44806/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Informative Links for June 28, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45497</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45497#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WhatAmIMissingHere</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[INFORMATIVE LINKS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/?p=45497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/america-sets-record-old-cars-140754018.html">America Sets a New Record for Old Cars</a> – CNBC   “Feel like you're driving an old car? You're not alone. In fact, the average age of vehicles in the U.S. has hit a new all-time high. Experian Automotive says the average age of the 245 million vehicles registered in the U.S. in the first quarter of this year was 11 years."

<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/27/house-dems-campaign-chief-urges-candidates-to-steer-clear-convention/#ixzz1z0On8XeX">House Dems' Campaign Chief Urges Candidates to Steer Clear of Convention</a> - Fox <a href="http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45497">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/america-sets-record-old-cars-140754018.html">America Sets a New Record for Old Cars</a> – CNBC   “Feel like you&#8217;re driving an old car? You&#8217;re not alone. In fact, the average age of vehicles in the U.S. has hit a new all-time high. Experian Automotive says the average age of the 245 million vehicles registered in the U.S. in the first quarter of this year was 11 years.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/27/house-dems-campaign-chief-urges-candidates-to-steer-clear-convention/#ixzz1z0On8XeX">House Dems&#8217; Campaign Chief Urges Candidates to Steer Clear of Convention</a> &#8211; Fox News   “The top Democrat in charge of getting other Democrats elected to the House is urging his party&#8217;s candidates to steer clear of the national convention later this year. The piece of advice from Rep. Steve Israel, D-N.Y., chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, ‘If they want to win an election, they need to be in their districts,’ Israel said of Democratic congressional candidates, according to Reuters.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/senate-deal-would-freeze-student-loan-rates-for-year/2012/06/26/gJQASkDN5V_story.html">Senate Deal Would Freeze Student-Loan Rates for Year</a> &#8211; Washington Post   “The agreement would freeze the interest rate for a year, preventing it from doubling from 3.4 percent to 6.8 percent on July 1, making college more affordable for students as tuition costs are rising. &#8230; If the deal emerges from Congress intact, Obama is likely to take credit for having forced the issue to the front of the agenda, but Republicans have countered that an agreement could have been reached weeks ago had Democrats not decided to make it a campaign issue. Republicans say that Democrats slow-walked the negotiations to allow the president to paint the GOP as recalcitrant and willing to risk higher college costs.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/28/us/stockton-california-heads-for-bankruptcy-court.html?_r=2&amp;partner=MYWAY&amp;ei=5065">Mediation Fails, Pushing Stockton Toward Bankruptcy</a> &#8211; NY Times   “The new budget will suspend debt payments, cut employee pay and reduce retiree benefits, allowing this city of about 292,000 residents to continue providing essential services through the bankruptcy process. &#8230; Bankruptcy experts and officials at other fiscally wounded cities are keeping close tabs on Stockton as it unravels.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatamimissinghere.com/archives/45497/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
